Judicial Crisis: Federal Judges' Concerns
According to the New York Times, some federal judges are dissatisfied with the Supreme Court's frequent grant of interim relief to the Trump Administration in cases challenging its actions.
More than three dozen federal judges have expressed to the New York Times that the Supreme Court's brief and opaque emergency orders in Trump administration-related cases have caused confusion about how to proceed and are damaging the judiciary's public image.
The Supreme Court's flurry of brief, opaque emergency orders... have left them confused about how to proceed in those matters and are hurting the judiciary's image with the public.
The critique from lower court judges reveals the strain on the federal judicial system due to litigation over Trump's agenda.
The story is based on a selective survey of federal judges conducted by the Times.
Author's summary: Judges criticize Supreme Court's actions.
More News
- Katrina Kaif, Vicky Kaushal Welcome A Baby Boy; Raveena Tandon On People Discussing Her Past With Akshay Kumar
- Linda Hamilton Was Considering Retirement Before 'Stranger Things' Came Along
- UPD: Alberta Conservative MP Matt Jeneroux resigns
- Interview: Comedian John Candy’s daughter on new documentary about her father’s legacy
- Jeremy Renner accused of threatening to 'call ICE' on ex-girlfriend Yi Zhou
- When new mom Katrina Kaif revealed father was ‘not an influence, not a part of family’, learnt to be ‘non-judgemental’ from mother: ‘I haven’t met him since’
- Katrina Kaif and Vicky Kaushal Welcome Their First Child, A Baby Boy | Outlook India
- 'Avengers: Secret Wars' Was Supposed to Be in Theaters Today
- Marvel star Jeremy Renner accused of threatening to call ICE on Chinese film partner: ‘Scared for my life’
- American Legion volunteers to fly flags this weekend for Veterans Day Tuesday