Can anyone blame David Kampf for signing a four-year deal that pays him an average of $2.4 million per season to play hockey? He secured a contract that offers both financial stability and some control over his future, including a limited no-trade clause.
Is it in any way David Kampf’s fault for somehow managing to also pick up a limited no trade clause in the process?
It seems likely that Kampf will return to the Marlies, Toronto’s AHL affiliate, or face limited options elsewhere.
David Kampf's deal reflects smart negotiation for security, but his prospects may largely depend on staying with the Marlies or finding no better alternatives.
Would you like the tone to be more formal or conversational?